|
Post by dave1800 on Sept 23, 2013 2:06:53 GMT
I recently posted a note about the potentially life threatening results if the G Valve fails but surprisingly there has been no response. G Valve threadHopefully everything is alright and they are all still functioning as they should. However, I thought it would be interesting to hear about how you check your brakes are working properly. Assuming you have carried out all of the safety checks to ensure there are no leaks, pipes, cylinders and calipers, pads and shoes are all fine; Do you (a) just rely on the MOT test to ensure the brakes are balanced and meet the requirements (b) find an open stretch of road or preferably somewhere off road to test the brakes under hard /emergency braking to ensure the car stops safely in a straight line and quickly. Maybe you are reluctant to put your car through such a test? If so, do you think you should? Interested in your thoughts David
|
|
|
Post by tommydp on Sept 23, 2013 14:44:53 GMT
Hi, Dave! Perhaps I've been lucky, but I've never even had the slightest issue with 1800 brakes. Well, except the one I had with the Powerstop servo which had no end of trouble.
The Super Vac units have proved extremely reliable in my experience, so has the rest of the braking system. I've never paid much attention to the G valve. I've always kept the calipers, pipes and hoses, wheel cylinders, master cylinder, pads and shoes ship shape and kept the rear brakes correctly adjusted. Other than watching the fluid level frequently I've done nothing.
The brakes feel safe and correct all the time and will stop the car instantly if needed. The 1800 also has the ultimate brakes for driving on ice and snow.
Speaking of brake safety, I suppose all owners have inspected if they have the front to rear brake pipe covered. Some, both mk 1 and early mk 2 have this pipe running behind a panel. I guess this is done to protect the pipe. Scary bit is the pipe may be rusting to pieces, and you wouldn't know as it is hidden.. Check it!
Regards, T
|
|
|
Post by ahctog1 on Sept 23, 2013 19:23:59 GMT
Mine always easily passes the MOT, even with the scabby discs it had on until recently. I have recently done a visual check all round (including taking of the rear drums etc.) The two front flexis were splitting in a spot that was well hidden, so replaced them, also the discs, pads and a couple of fixed pipes. I then tested them (after some mileage)....they pulled up straight and pretty sharply, handbrake sharp too. Seems about right to me!
|
|
|
Post by Nick RS on Sept 23, 2013 20:45:27 GMT
David, I read the article in the LOCI Magazine. I haven't tested my brakes in the manner that you describe but I think I should go and find somewhere this weekend and see how things are. If something breaks (no typo) then I'd sooner it be on a quiet industrial estate than for real on the main road. Having said that the brakes feel very effective. I recently brought a 2.5+ tonne Range Rover from 60MPH to rest on emergency braking with brake assist, ABS and the full works. Very impressive but still quite frightening. Our Landcrab brakes are single circuit I believe so it's important to respect them, I check the reservoir a bit more often than is maybe good for me.
Nick
|
|
|
Post by Penguin45 on Sept 23, 2013 23:34:40 GMT
Last time I really stamped on the brakes was when I fitted the newly re-faced discs with the Green Stuff pads. That must be several years ago now.
Like Nick, I tend to check the brake (and clutch) reservoir before most runs out.
Chris.
|
|
|
Post by dave1800 on Sept 24, 2013 1:00:03 GMT
Thanks Tommy You have raised an important point about the front to rear pipe being slotted behind a welded cover. On the Mk11s I have owned this pipe is also protected by a moulded rubber sleeve along much of its length and was impossible to see if it is corroded. I think the safest thing is to replace it, but admit on the couple of occasions I have done so, the original pipe has been fine, but they are getting old now. Regards David Speaking of brake safety, I suppose all owners have inspected if they have the front to rear brake pipe covered. Some, both mk 1 and early mk 2 have this pipe running behind a panel. I guess this is done to protect the pipe. Scary bit is the pipe may be rusting to pieces, and you wouldn't know as it is hidden.. Check it! Regards, T
|
|
|
Post by dave1800 on Sept 24, 2013 1:08:09 GMT
Hi Nick I guess because I had a short stint at rallying, nothing serious, I got into the habit of finding out the braking and handling limits of every car I have owned somewhere safe off road. If there is a problem with the G valve it should be apparent at 30mph. Just be prepared for the back to come round very rapidly in a most unlike Landcrab way so keep well clear of any curbs etc. You certainly don't want the first time you find there is a problem to be a real life emergency! Regards David David, I read the article in the LOCI Magazine. I haven't tested my brakes in the manner that you describe but I think I should go and find somewhere this weekend and see how things are. If something breaks (no typo) then I'd sooner it be on a quiet industrial estate than for real on the main road. Having said that the brakes feel very effective. I recently brought a 2.5+ tonne Range Rover from 60MPH to rest on emergency braking with brake assist, ABS and the full works. Very impressive but still quite frightening. Our Landcrab brakes are single circuit I believe so it's important to respect them, I check the reservoir a bit more often than is maybe good for me. Nick
|
|
|
Post by dave1800 on Sept 24, 2013 2:03:34 GMT
Chris I think you are not alone in only trying the brakes after fitting new pads and then I assume mainly relying on visual inspections and the MOT to ensure they are even and meet the levels required. In the real world brakes could be a problem in an emergency stop for numerous reasons other than just the braking system. I just read about a VW Tiguan owner whose rear wheels locked up and left a 35 metre skid mark. It turned out the diff had seized after 45,000kms! Perhaps a worthwhile investigation into whether there are any brake fluid level sensors available that can be easily fitted to he cap? If not it should be relatively simple to make something. Regards David Last time I really stamped on the brakes was when I fitted the newly re-faced discs with the Green Stuff pads. That must be several years ago now. Like Nick, I tend to check the brake (and clutch) reservoir before most runs out. Chris.
|
|
|
Post by dave1800 on Sept 24, 2013 7:27:17 GMT
Early days maybe, but I am beginning to get the feeling that a number of owners do not know whether their G valves are actually working or not as it is only obvious when braking very hard which is something you would normally wish to avoid, especially with a classic.
If you look at your w/s manuals you will see the valves have pistons with seals that are now probably well past their use by date.
Is this a fair assessment?
David
|
|
|
Post by Nick RS on Sept 24, 2013 21:47:41 GMT
David, In my case, yes, a fair assessment. I won't know if it is working properly or not until testing it which you've convinced me is a worthwhile exercise. It will have to wait until the weekend as the car is currently covered up and boxed in as my garage painting job continues. Here's a query. With any car without ABS I would expect the brakes to lock up if I stand on the pedal. If the g valve is working I would expect the brakes to still lock up under extreme braking but be OK under hard braking. If it is faulty then I would expect it to lock on moderate or moderately hard braking. Am I along the right lines?
Nick
|
|
|
Post by dave1800 on Sept 25, 2013 1:21:06 GMT
Nick If you look at the original road tests carried out with tyre sizes of 175x13 (Mk1), 165x14 Mk11 /111 all the cars were able to lock their front wheels under very heavy panic braking and the Mk1 eventually locked all four. The G valve does not affect the front brakes directly although by reducing the braking to the rear wheels does allow for more weight transfer to the front reducing the chance of front wheels locking. If the G valve on Mk1 / Mk11 cars is not working properly the rear wheels will lock under moderate braking. Alternatively if the valve is seized shut there will be very little or no rear wheel braking. This would show up on a MOT test unlike the seized open situation. It is important to have some rear wheel braking to keep the back in line. The symptoms would be more front end dip under braking similar to Mk111 cars. Mk111 cars had less rear wheel braking than earlier models and the valve may either reduce this further or possibly stick open. The latter would result in brakes that feel more effective at low to moderate braking. If a Mk111 car suffers rear wheel lock up under any normal conditions ie wet roads but not ice, the valve almost certainly needs to be examined. 1800S cars had more front end braking and should be able to lock the front wheels sooner (Alexander?) Some other points to note. If the front calipers / pads are not 100% there will be less nose dip and the rear brakes may cause some intermittent lockup under hard braking. The road tests were carried out in unladen cars. Modern 70 profile tyres may prevent front wheel lock up on a good dry surface but make it more likely in the wet. Remember the original tests were mainly carried out on textile radials so if you cannot get front wheel lock up it is not necessarily something to worry about unduly. Before carrying out the test ensure all tyre pressures are correct and have a check over the braking and suspension components so that you can readily isolate any issue to the G valve. regards David David, In my case, yes, a fair assessment. I won't know if it is working properly or not until testing it which you've convinced me is a worthwhile exercise. It will have to wait until the weekend as the car is currently covered up and boxed in as my garage painting job continues. Here's a query. With any car without ABS I would expect the brakes to lock up if I stand on the pedal. If the g valve is working I would expect the brakes to still lock up under extreme braking but be OK under hard braking. If it is faulty then I would expect it to lock on moderate or moderately hard braking. Am I along the right lines? Nick
|
|
|
Post by Nick RS on Sept 25, 2013 16:04:35 GMT
David, thank you for the comprehensive answer. I now know what to expect and will report back after the test.
Nick
|
|
|
Post by dave1800 on Sept 27, 2013 1:21:42 GMT
I have received this very comprehensive note from Tony, the webmaster at the Eighteenhundred website about the brakes fitted to Australian 1800s. It would appear that the later Mk11 cars had a much safer dual circuit system than UK vehicles and this obviated the need for a G valve or similar. Perhaps Tommy or Alexander or other readers in non UK markets could provide details of their braking systems to complete the picture? Andrew which system do you have in NZ? In Australia, early MK1 cars had the Girling brakes with proportioning valve for the rear, and power assistance on all four wheels. In the transition to MKII, early MKII's still had Girling brakes - probably until the factory ran out of stock. Later MKII had PBR brakes. These brakes have dual opposing pistons in the front calipers, power assistance to the front calipers only, a dual tandem master cylinder with separate circuit to rear brakes. Rear brakes have no power assistance, and no pressure proportioning valve at all. The rear brakes have one leading and one trailing shoe, with a self adjusting mechanism that set the shoe to drum clearance via a ratchet that operated when the handbrake was applied. These same brakes were fitted to quite a few other makes in Australia as the laws here favoured the manufacturer if they increased the local content. They are quite good brakes, and have more capacity than needed for the size of car - the usual fitment is on larger 6 cylinder Holdens and Chryslers. Manual cars have a pressure balance switch that illuminates the spare orange dash light to signify a loss of pressure in either front or rear circuits (just so you can be fully informed of a failure in one circuit while you are panicking and trying to stop). Automatic cars did not have this switch because it is mounted in the place where the automatic cable bracket is just near the master cylinders. In the auto case, that spare orange light is there, but there is no bulb fitted. I am not a MKI expert and can't say if anyone has had problems but I will be seeing someone tomorrow who has 5 MK1 cars and he should be able to tell me something. We recently sent you by email a request for information about your braking systems and experiences. A number of you have kindly provided some interesting details. May I take this opportunity to remind you if you have not already replied that it would be helpful if you could do so by the 5th October. This is your forum and the chance to help the safe continuity of these cars.
If you have not received an email, please check your details are correct on this site. If not please amend them and PM me so I can forward the email to you.
Many thanks David
|
|
|
Post by Nick RS on Sept 29, 2013 16:30:37 GMT
On my way back from the LOCI meet today I pulled into a local industrial estate which I knew would be quiet. The car pulled up sharp under emergency braking and didn't lock the wheels until it almost came to a stop and then it was the fronts only. The brakes are a lot better than I expected on a car of this age though I am sure that a warm dry day helps. With a bit more confidence I did it another couple of times and then with hands off the wheel, it pulled up straight.
Thank you David, I will do this from time to time from now on.
Nick
|
|
|
Post by dave1800 on Sept 30, 2013 0:17:15 GMT
That's excellent news Nick. Now don't forget to change your "marginal" brake fluid. Thanks for the photos they make me feel homesick! Maybe some others will report back now on their brake test experiences so we can pull the information together. Regards David On my way back from the LOCI meet today I pulled into a local industrial estate which I knew would be quiet. The car pulled up sharp under emergency braking and didn't lock the wheels until it almost came to a stop and then it was the fronts only. The brakes are a lot better than I expected on a car of this age though I am sure that a warm dry day helps. With a bit more confidence I did it another couple of times and then with hands off the wheel, it pulled up straight. Thank you David, I will do this from time to time from now on. Nick
|
|